Annals of Emergency Dispatch & Response Logo

911 Attitudes, Barriers, and Experiences Among Diverse Communities in Utah

Dec 22, 2021|AEDR 2021 Vol. 9 Issue 3|Original Research
Download PDF


Background: Previously, researchers have identified barriers and facilitators to using 911 in Black and Hispanic communities. However, there are many other groups that have access to 911 service, who have not yet been represented in the literature. Prior to this study, a Community Engagement Studio (a focus group forum) was held to solicit input from representatives of various diverse communities in Salt Lake Valley on their attitudes, experiences, and perceptions of their local 911 services.

Objectives: The objective was to identify attitudes, barriers, and experiences in utilizing 911 service among certain diverse communities in Salt Lake County, Utah, USA that may be underserved by 911 communication centers.  

Methods: The researchers held focus groups at five study sites in Salt Lake County. A total of 65 participants were recruited into the study by community advisory board representatives. Focus group discussions covered topics related to challenges with using 911 and other aspects of participant experiences. The analysts shared detailed descriptions of themes with community members for feedback. 

Results: The study identified seven significant barriers to calling 911: anxiety/fear, mistrust, privacy, ambiguity, financial, structural, and language. The major themes that emerged, which described experiences and attitudes, were making difficult decisions, disconnect from 911, and using 911 is risky.

Conclusion: The results demonstrated significant implications for the development of targeted 911 education that better addresses the ambiguities and risks perceived in emergency situations, as well as the provision of cultural training for emergency dispatch professionals and the diverse communities.

Keywords: 911 Education, Attitudes, Barriers, Expectations, Diverse Communities, Emergency Dispatch




1. Neusteter RS, Mapolski M, Khogali M, O’Toole M. The 911 Call Processing System: A Review of the Literature as It Relates to Policing. New York, New York: Vera Institute of Justice; 2019. Accessed April 5, 2021. 

2. Lowe T, French M, Hawkins M, Hesselgreaves H, Wilson R. New development: responding to complexity in public services—the human learning systems approach. Public Money Manag. 2020; doi:10.1080/09540962.2020.1832738

3. Mayron R, Long RS, Ruiz E. The 911 emergency telephone number: impact on emergency medical systems access in a metropolitan area. Am J Emerg Med. 1984;2(6):491-493. doi:10.1016/0735-6757(84)90070-6

4. 9-1-1 Statistics. National Emergency Number Association website. Updated February 2021. Accessed April 5, 2021.

5. Sasson C, Haukoos JS, Ben-Youssef L, et al. Barriers to calling 911 and learning and performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation for residents of primarily Latino, high-risk neighborhoods in Denver, Colorado. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;65(5):545-552.e2. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.10.028

6. Sasson C, Magid DJ, Chan P, et al. Association of neighborhood characteristics with bystander-initiated CPR. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(17):1607-1615. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1110700

7. Sasson C, Keirns CC, Smith DM, et al. Examining the contextual effects of neighborhood on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and the provision of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2011;82(6):674-679. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.02.002

8. Vaillancourt C, Lui A, De Maio VJ, Wells GA, Stiell IG. Socioeconomic status influences bystander CPR and survival rates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims. Resuscitation. 2008;79(3):417-423. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.07.012

9. Clawson A. 9-1-1 As a Dangerous Symbol: The Misconceptions of the Emergency Medical Dispatch System. University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. 1997 (unpublished capstone project).

10. Holkup PA, Tripp-Reimer T, Salois EM, Weinert C. Community-based participatory research: an approach to intervention research with a Native American community. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2004;27(3):162-175. doi:10.1097/00012272-200407000-00002

11. U.S. Census Bureau Quick Facts: Salt Lake County, Utah. United States Census Bureau website. Updated July 1, 2019. Accessed April 5, 2021.,UT/PST045219

12. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2);77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

13. UT Admin Code R426-8. Utah Office of Administrative Rules website. Accessed April 5, 2021.

14. Damico AJ, Conway MM, Damico SB. Patterns of political trust and mistrust: three moments in the lives of democratic citizens. Polity. 2000;32(3). doi: 10.2307/3235357

15. Benson PC, Eckstein M, McClung CD, Henderson SO. Racial/ethnic differences in bystander CPR in Los Angeles, California. Ethn Dis. 2009;19(4):401-406.

16. Mangum M. Explaining political trust among african americans. Journal of Public Management & Social Policy. 2016;23(2);84-100. Accessed April 5, 2021.

17. Armstrong K, Ravenell KL, McMurphy S, Putt M. Racial/ethnic differences in physician distrust in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(7):1283-1289. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.080762

18. James N, Finklea K, Novak WK, Lampe JR, Anderson AJ, Sekar K. Public trust and law enforcement – a discussion for policymakers. Congressional Research Service. Updated July 13, 2020. Accessed April 5, 2021.

19. Public Education Tools & 9-1-1 Education Month. National Emergency Number Association website. Accessed April 5, 2021.

20. Leung FH, Savithiri R. Spotlight on focus groups. Can Fam Physician. 2009;55(2):218-219.

21. Smithson J. Using and analysing focus groups: limitations and possibilities. Int J Soc Res Method. 2000;3(2):103-119. Accessed April 5, 2021. 

22. Access for 9-1-1 and Telephone Emergency Services under the ADA. United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division website. Accessed April 5, 2021.